| Files | Time [UT] | Comments | Cnt | S | Ope |
|---|
| L10290 | 00:19:09 | Start of experiment | 0 | 0 | |
| L10290 | 00:33:05 | Both channels running now. incremented | 3425 | 1 | EG |
| L10291 | 01:05:15 | Haze in the beam. atempting to adjust HWP anyways | | 1 | EG |
| L10291 | 01:09:57 | Ending HWP adjustment, the haze is interfering to much | | 1 | EG |
| L10291 | 01:14:07 | tweeked Rayleigh convergence, moved sodium chopp +10usec | | 1 | EG |
| L10291 | 01:14:18 | incremented | 3191 | 1 | EG |
| L10292 | 01:21:57 | Strange increase and fall in sodium counts, laseted a few recs?? | | 1 | EG |
| L10292 | 01:30:46 | We have a very pathcy thin haze a fewhundred meters | 1313 | 1 | EG |
| | overhead. this is causing big variations in counts from | | | |
| | profile to profile. | | | |
| L10292 | 01:33:35 | UPS! after quiting the HWP adjust routine I forgot to change | | 1 | EG |
| | recs per scan on the sodium SR430!! Incremented | | | |
| L10293 | 01:46:01 | Sodum wavemeter checked now and it hasn't buched from | | 1 | EG |
| | 589.158nm since the beginning of the run! | | | |
| L10293 | 03:23:23 | The rayleigh return seems to have fallen steadily oveer the | | 1 | EG |
| | last half hour. Converged | | | |
| L10293 | 03:25:00 | Checking to see if it is the HWP tracking, going into tweek | | 1 | EG |
| | mode | | | |
| L10293 | 03:41:20 | Done, the HWP were not tracing propperly!! Starting | | 1 | EG |
| | data Aq again without Tracking, will look into it! | | | |
| L10294 | 03:44:20 | running again with no HWP tracking, incremented | 8842 | 2 | EG |
| L10294 | 04:57:48 | small peak visible on both channels at ~8km | 8409 | 2 | EG |
| L10294 | 05:06:01 | Checkined wavemter. Wavelength 589.158nm, flashing | | 2 | EG |
| | 589.159nm every now and then. Ambient temp about 1.5deg | | | |
| Files | Time [UT] | Comments | Cnt | S | Ope |
|---|
| L10294 | 05:07:30 | above the starting temp or 24.4deg C. | | 2 | EG |
| L10294 | 05:15:55 | Moved sodium chopper altitude down by 40usec or 6km | | 2 | EG |
| L10294 | 05:44:28 | Wavemter now showing 589.159 and flashing 589.160 | 8200 | 2 | EG |
| | once in a while. | | | |
| L10294 | 05:55:41 | Wavemeter showing 589.160 most of the time falshing | 8116 | 2 | EG |
| | 589.159 on acation. Tuned down 2pm or to 589.158nm | | | |
| | This is probly due to the slight drift in ambient temp. | | | |
| L10294 | 06:03:46 | Looks as if the chopper altitude move downward is perhaps | | 2 | EG |
| | introducing signal induced noise. Moving the chopper alt | | | |
| | up by 40usec (6km) to see if that is the case. | | | |
| L10294 | 06:11:55 | I think it's safe to say that after moving the chopper altitude | 8528 | 2 | EG |
| | up by 6km has changed the topside of the ryaleigh return on | | | |
| | the sodium channel to the better. The conclusion must be | | | |
| | that with the current energy level from the dye laser the | | | |
| | lowest chopper altitude is around 12-15km. The peek of the | | | |
| | sodium reayleigh return is ~21km with this chopper setting | | | |
| L10294 | 06:25:09 | End of experiment | 8816 | 2 | EG |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |