| Files | Time [UT] | Comments | Cnt | S | Ope |
|---|
| L20020820_000 | 12:09:01 | Start of experiment | | 1 | JJ |
| 12:12:29 | counts at 30km | 2531 | 1 | JJ |
| L20020820_004 | 00:08:18 | removing daystar | 2906 | 1 | EG |
| 00:09:49 | Done removing daystar, running with setup 0, increment | | 0 | EG |
| 00:10:22 | crash of the lidar program | | 0 | EG |
| 00:11:49 | resumed | | 0 | EG |
| 00:12:56 | counts | 11696 | 0 | EG |
| 01:13:35 | The skies have been clear all day and it's a beutiful clear | | 0 | EG |
| | night. Going to test out the daytime path | | | |
| 01:38:26 | After tuning trough the entire range of the controller | | 0 | EG |
| | (0-12V) two similar maxima were found at voltage 4.565V | | | |
| | and 8.990V and the counts @200km were dissapointing | | | |
| | 789 and 722. Note this is with the unseeded laser. | | | |
| | Started the seeding and proceeding with the same scan | | | |
| | to see if there is a difference. | | | |
| 02:02:37 | Laser seeding now doin a voltage sweep | | 0 | EG |
| 02:14:12 | Done sweeping in seeded mode. Even though the energy of | | 0 | EG |
| | the laser has fallen from 505mJ to 420mJ when seeding | | | |
| | was turned off the result of the tuning was that a slightly | | | |
| | stronger signal was found at set voltage 4.280-4.430 with | | | |
| | counts at 30km 847 and 834 (for two scans). Also, when | | | |
| | tuning with the seeded laser there was a bigger difference | | | |
| | from a low in the signal and to the hign. or as much a 50% | | | |
| | drop in signal in lowest signal accheived compared to the | | | |