| Files | Time [UT] | Comments | Cnt | S | Ope |
|---|
| L20080304_001 | 02:35:00 | Start of experiment | | 0 | cp |
| L20080320_000 | 04:50:34 | Phew. Still having problems converging and strugling with | | 0 | cp |
| | the low alt. peak. | | | |
| L20080320_000 | 05:06:12 | Since the last time; The primary and secondary mirrors | | 0 | cp |
| | have been adjusted. | | | |
| L20080320_001 | 05:38:43 | The frontend has been properly fixed inside the telescope, | | 0 | cp |
| | which shows in the consistent profile. | | | |
| | It is still very hard to converge and adjust the iris, so that | | | |
| | an acceptable profile is acquired. | | | |
| | And the low alt. "Hump" is still a problem | | | |
| L20080320_001 | 06:16:09 | Hard to improve in terms of counts and low alt. return. | | 0 | cp |
| | Now trying to find a profile without afterpulsing | | | |
| L20080320_001 | 06:18:38 | Still some AP (After Pulsing). Will now push up chopper a | | 0 | cp |
| | a notch. | | | |
| L20080320_001 | 06:20:40 | This profile is a small progress from before adjusting the | 265 | 0 | cp |
| | 1. and 2. mirrors. | | | |
| | We are getting a little higher as well +5km | | | |
| | Still difficult to adjust out the low alt. return. | | | |
| | There are some minor details in the alignment of the | | | |
| | RX path, but I do not think they will provide much improvement | | | |
| L20080320_001 | 06:31:37 | Now the HW plates will be flipping. | 258 | 0 | cp |
| L20080320_001 | 06:41:26 | The counts differs between 250 and 70 on flipped records | 250 | 0 | cp |
| L20080320_001 | 06:42:29 | | 72 | 0 | cp |
| L20080320_001 | 06:43:49 | | 265 | 0 | cp |
| Files | Time [UT] | Comments | Cnt | S | Ope |
|---|
| L20080320_001 | 06:45:17 | It really is a relief to see a reliable profile with a consistent | | 0 | cp |
| | profile shape and solid counts. | | | |
| L20080320_001 | 06:47:27 | It should be possible to get a little better counts and maybe | | 0 | cp |
| | a little higher, when fine tuning the RX alignment. | | | |
| | But the source of the low alt. return is still not found. | 254 | | |
| L20080320_001 | 07:15:09 | | 87 | 0 | cp |
| L20080320_001 | 07:21:21 | | 248 | 0 | cp |
| L20080320_001 | 07:26:31 | | 94 | 0 | cp |
| L20080320_001 | 07:26:58 | As the last thing tonight, the rayleigh chopper will be flipped | | 0 | cp |
| | So that the focal point will be chopped from the other side. | | | |
| | This means dismantling some of the Raman path, so the | | | |
| | Raman daq. will be shut down now. | | | |
| L20080320_001 | 07:29:48 | Raman app. crashed. hmmm.... | 244 | 0 | cp |
| L20080320_001 | 07:44:42 | Thats an ugly profile. Of course the chopper delay is rubbish | | 0 | cp |
| | now; Furthermore, there was not enough real estate to do | | | |
| | this quick and good, so the chopper blade is not chopping | | | |
| | through the focal point. But I think it is close enough to | | | |
| | get a feeling of the difference. Ref: Chopper delay in original | | | |
| | setup was 35. Will now find a proper delay. | | | |
| L20080320_002 | 08:12:30 | Stopping flipping. | | 0 | cp |
| L20080320_002 | 08:15:31 | Interesting. With the chopper flipped, handling the low alt. | | 0 | cp |
| | return is easy, just raise the chopper heigth and it is gone. | | | |
| L20080320_002 | 08:17:23 | The profile does not look good now, will try and improve it | | 0 | cp |
| | Bear in mind that the focal point is off by ~2mm. | | | |
| Files | Time [UT] | Comments | Cnt | S | Ope |
|---|
| L20080320_002 | 08:18:53 | Also, the peak of the profile is sharpe, even though it is | | 0 | cp |
| | not chopping through the focal point. | | | |
| | I will try and raise the profile. | | | |
| L20080320_002 | 08:26:28 | Well the profile is crap. But it is really, really interesting | | 0 | cp |
| | to see the effect on the low alt. return. | | | |
| | Frontend iris and 2. iris are both wide open. The chopper | | | |
| | takes care of the low alt. return. | | | |
| | I really need to spend some time on repositioning the | | | |
| | chopper, so that it is in the focal point of the relay. | | | |
| | However, if this is going to be a solution, some rethinking of | | | |
| | the RX layout needs to be done. The chopper blocks the | | | |
| | RAMAN path as it is now. | | | |
| L20080320_002 | 08:31:36 | End of experiment | | 0 | cp |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |